This past Saturday I served as a judge at the county's History Day competition, helping to pick winners to go on to the state competition and, with hope, nationals. This year's theme was Conflict and Compromise in History (of which there has been a lot). I had no dog in this fight; I just thought it would be fun to see how fifth through twelfth graders interpreted some moment in history. And that's what I kept reminding myself when I arose at 5:30 and had to skip my ritual Saturday morning run with friends because I had volunteered away half my day during a moment of weakness.
Now, I know you're wondering to yourselves, didn't Mother Teresa caution us that "If you judge people, you have no
time to love them"? And the answer is, yes she did. However, since I wasn't lookin' for lovin' by a bunch of
teenagers, I thought it would be okay to judge them.
And I had a grand time. I've served as a moot court judge on many an occasion, just for jollies. I always feel bad for the kids who are really nervous, so I make it a point to say something positive and smile a lot to get them comfortable and make them believe they are doing just fine. I suggested to my History Day co-judges that we all start out with positive comments. Whenever the dude next to me was about to ask a question he would preface it by saying to the students, "First I will say a positive comment," which made him sound like a programmed robot rather than someone moved by the presentation. Then he'd offer something trite like, "I liked a lot your performance." Then he'd say--and this part made me embarrassed for him and feel sorry for his victims--"but now I have some questions for you." His tone and choice of words completely neutralized his "positive comment." I just smiled at the kids and nodded encouragingly to make up for the ninny who was making them more nervous.
I was charged with the responsibility of judging middle schoolers in the Group Performance category. This required of them a lot of work, from researching and analyzing their topic, to writing a script, creating a set with props, providing an annotated bibliography and "process paper" that described how they went about it all. And finally, there was the ACTING! I tip my hat to all them kids; they did a phenomenal job.
Early on there was a bit of a kerfuffle. The students were allowed five minutes to set their stage while the judges read the process papers and bibliographies. Then each group had ten minutes to perform, after which they were subjected to a five minute interview with the judges. My understanding of the rules was that during the interview portion, there were to be no audience members in the room, only the students and judges. This didn't happen with the first group because no one ushered away the audience. Before the second group of students arrived to put up their set, but while some members of the audience were coming in, I asked one of the History Day volunteer assistants if she was supposed to clear the room between the performance and the interview. She didn't know but said that she would go check. Meanwhile, a man behind me grumbled as more audience members arrived.
When the assistant returned she said to me, "Okay, I will clear the audience after the performance but before the interview." Just as I was about to thank her, the grumbling man took it to a roar.
"WHAT? THAT'S NOT FAIR! WE GOT TO SIT IN LAST YEAR!! HALF THE FUN OF THE PERFORMANCE IS THE INTERVIEW!! THIS IS OUTRAGEOUS!!" blah blah blah as he beat on his chest and bared his canines.
I could tell from first read that 1) this guy was one of the parents and, worse yet, he was one of those parents, and 2) he considered himself the Silverback of the group, an a-hole who tries to use intimidation to get his way. So I completely ignored him and thanked the assistant for her help. I think this pissed him off because he yelled some more to the back of my head, pretty much repeating what he had yelled the first time. The assistant, a sweet middle-aged woman who, I could tell from first read, was one of those people who is uncomfortable with conflict, just kept saying, "I'm sorry, sir." They went back and forth in this manner, he yelling, she apologizing, while people in the audience sat quietly waiting to see how things would go down. Then the assistant walked over to me, leaned down, and whispered, "What am I supposed to do in this situation?"
In full voice I said, "Well, I don't want to--"
"Start a controversy?" she interrupted, looking at the Silverback.
"No, I have no problem with that," I said, never once looking at the Silverback. "I don't want to have a student disqualified if the rule is that there is not supposed to be an audience for the interview portion. I don't care what the parent says, I want to know what the rules say." And with that, I sent her off again to find out exactly what the rule was.
And now, a question. You catch more flies with honey than with vinegar: True or False?
Yeah, I thought so.
The assistant returned once again with the announcement that it was totally up to me, and that she would do whatever I asked. That was her answer from On High. Geez--what about the rules, people? You need rules to guide you in this situation, else you have lunatic parents suing the department of education for all manner of injustices done to their children. And so it was that I decided to let the Silverback stay, knowing full well he was taping everything with his little digital camera. No doubt he will use his documentary evidence when he appeals our decision not to pronounce his Princess' performance a winner.* But I'll be long gone by then.
_______
*Which had nothing to do with him and everything to do with the fact that some of the groups kicked History Day ass.
Recent Comments